CMDV is a commodity-anchored reference system designed to be structurally incapable of insolvency. It separates monetary measurement from monetary policy.
CMDV decouples absolute safety from market optionality through a dual-token structure. This ensures liquidity is channeled to where it belongs without compromising the solvency floor.
Unique embedded metadata including the exact reference value at time of minting ensures redemptions never exceed original inflows.
An optional wrapper representing fungible tokens in the open market, maintaining full compatibility with global exchanges.
CMDV does not attempt to stabilize prices; it stabilizes solvency. As the reference value changes, liabilities adjust automatically, eliminating reflexive insolvency even during extreme drawdowns.
Verification over Trust
Model behavior across economic cycles
"CMDV does not ask for belief, enthusiasm, or trust. It exists because the current monetary system no longer provides an honest unit of measurement for ordinary people."
Over time, the unit itself has become unstable—not in a dramatic way, but in a quiet, grinding way that transfers value without consent or visibility. This erosion is not accidental; it is the predictable outcome of systems that allow discretionary control over money, opacity in accounting, and politicized measurement of inflation.
CMDV was created to answer a simple question: What should a unit of account be anchored to if it is meant to be fair, legible, and structurally honest? The answer is not ideological—it is physical.
CMDV defines value by reference to a fixed basket of raw, upstream commodities—the inputs civilization runs on. Energy, food, and materials. Not consumer products. Not policy indices. Not promises. Just the observable cost of the physical world. The system is intentionally constrained. It cannot create value by decree, it cannot hide insolvency, and it cannot promise more than reality can deliver.
"This is not generosity; it is arithmetic."
If CMDV succeeds only modestly—if it gives households, businesses, or institutions a clearer way to measure value over time—then it has served its purpose. If it fails, it will fail visibly and honestly, without trapping participants in a system they cannot audit or understand.